My Day of Digital Humanities begins with crack of dawn wake up, exercise, then getting
ready for work.  By 715 I’m in my office
ordering food for a lunch meeting.  I teach three classes today so not much DH is going to happen (update until late it turns out because I can't stand to be left out of the fun of #DayofDH)
So far my sole contact with DH work has been to sign the
time sheet for the graduate assistant I’m lucky to have.  She spent the semester digitizing periodicals
for me, creating a spread sheet of citations, and now will start on the laborious
process of cleaning the data.  Because
she also works as an intern I spent several hours yesterday experimenting with
methods for cleaning some particularly tedious multi-column pages, and then
emailing her instructions.   I'm hoping to write a short part II follow up to my first post on the results of this project. 
In a quick 1.5 hour break from teaching, I'm going to work on my google doc journal for a grant funded metacognition pedagogy project. No history but at least digital!
I wrote the above all before lunch,then taught, commuted home, hit emergency dentist repair, had family time and then spent the lasttwo hours four hours doing the digital work to write the following, the second part of doing women's history with digital methods.
 
In this review we might get closest to the idea of cultural feminism, unsurprisingly since these are the very authors most frequently "named" as cultural feminists. But the question then becomes when placed in the quantitative context, why is the way nature was used by other authors less important in defining the "kind" of feminism spoken in Chrysalis.* And if Chrysalis speaks nature quantitatively more than OOB, but does it speak it qualitatively differently? Next up close readings of the “nature of” in OOB that will hopefully shed some more light. 
postscripts
In a quick 1.5 hour break from teaching, I'm going to work on my google doc journal for a grant funded metacognition pedagogy project. No history but at least digital!
I wrote the above all before lunch,then taught, commuted home, hit emergency dentist repair, had family time and then spent the last
Keyness
Keyness measures the
frequency of a word in a corpus relative to is usage in another corpus.  This makes it an interesting way to compare
corpora.  If we look at Chrysalis and OOB,
the words with the highest keyness (higher value = more exceptional), the words
that "pop" might not suprirse any scholar of women’s liberation or really any
schlar familiar with feminist theory.  
Female, nature, body goddess, which initially would appear
to be confirming descriptions and impressions of cultural feminism from the
literature, but using digtal tools reveals a deeper story. While nature is more
frequent in Chrysalis, Frequency 348, with kyness of 247, oob 215, both
periodicals have the same collocate & cluster for nature “nature of.” Given
the other keyness words we might expect to see “the nature of the female body”
or the nature of women” or the nature of the goddess.  Using the concordance view reveals that
“nature of” does not end with any of those ways.
Instead we see nature of over
94 times in forty-five items, almost a third of those that comprise that Chrysalis
concordance.  Clearly the writers in this
periodical liked the turn of phrase, but how are they using it? The Concordance
view allows for close reading which reveals exactly how  “nature of” used and very few include
references to women or female or body 
I spent the past almost two
hours hand cleaning and culling the following data:
1           nature of painting  Chrysalis 1 No. 1  Article 10 
Pg 101.txt
2          nature of the ailment         Chrysalis 1 No. 1  Article 7 
Pg 67.txt
3          nature of her is culpable {reference to
Eve, critical]     Chrysalis 1 No. 1,  Article Pg 31-1.txt
4 DUPLICATE
4 DUPLICATE
5          nature of woman [critical of male
usage] Chrysalis 1 No. 1,  Article 6  Pg 55.txt
6          nature of our work   Chrysalis 1 No. 1,  Article 6 
Pg 55.txt
7          nature of the animal          Chrysalis 1 No. 1,  Article 6 
Pg 55.txt
8          nature of sexual identity Chrysalis 10
No.  10 Table of Contents.txt letter from
Eleanor Antin
9 nature of their activities.
9 nature of their activities.
            Chrysalis
10 No.  10 Table of Contents.txt letter
from Eleanor Antin
10        nature of the virtues Chrysalis 10
No.  10 Table of Contents.txt letter from
Eleanor Antin
11        nature of reality. Chrysalis 10 No.  10 Table of Contents.txt letter from Eleanor
Antin
13        nature of the self and  "the other" Chrysalis 10 No.  10 Table of Contents.txt letter from Eleanor
Antin
 14       nature
of the child. Chrysalis 10 No. 10  Article 1 
Pg 13.txt
15        nature of my children, cause th'ey're
all grown now and got Chrysalis 10 No.
10  Article 1  Pg 13.txt
16        nature of the genre Chrysalis 10 No. 10  Article 7 
Pg 51 (1).txt
17         "the nature of rape has changed”           Chrysalis 10 No. 10  Article 7 
Pg 51 (1).txt
18        nature of women's everyday dress          Chrysalis 2 No. 2  Article 12 
Pg 91.txt
19        nature of human      Chrysalis 2 No. 2 
Article 16  Pg 115.txt
20        the nature of their relationship   Chrysalis 2 No. 2  Article 16 
Pg 115.txt
21        nature of his existence      Chrysalis 2 No. 2  Article 16 
Pg 115.txt
22        nature of the process of growth.  Chrysalis 2 No. 2  Article 18 
Pg 131.txt
23         nature of the creation process    Chrysalis 2 No. 2  Article 2 
Pg 11 (1).txt
24        nature of man himself, Chrysalis 2 No.
2  Article 2  Pg 11 (1).txt
25        nature of a culture  Chrysalis 2 No. 2  Article 3 
Pg 19 (1).txt
26        nature of the participation            Chrysalis 2 No. 2  Article 3 
Pg 19 (1).txt
27        nature of the thicket,          Chrysalis 2 No. 2  Article 6 
Pg 49.txt
28        nature of oppressive female role
conditioning            Chrysalis 2 No.
2  Article 7  Pg 53.txt
29        " nature of the foundation beast”           Chrysalis 3 No. 3,  Article 13 
Pg 103.txt
30        nature of political force     Chrysalis 3 No. 3,  Article 15 
Pg 119.txt
31         nature of phenomenon     Chrysalis 3 No. 3,  Article 2 
Pg 11.txt
32        male-centered nature        Chrysalis 3 No. 3,  Article 2 
Pg 11.txt
33         nature of women and men           Chrysalis 3 No. 3,  Article 2 
Pg 11.txt
34         “nature of gender dissatisfaction” Chrysalis
3 No. 3,  Article 2  Pg 11.txt
35        nature of the women's movement during
the rapidly changing        Chrysalis 3
No. 3,  Article 6  Pg 43.txt
36        nature of our human           Chrysalis 3 No. 3,  Article 6 
Pg 43.txt
37        nature of class         Chrysalis 3 No. 3, 
Article 6  Pg 43.txt
38        nature of their private lives          Chrysalis 3 No. 3,  Article 6 
Pg 43.txt
39        nature of women's  differing sexual  preferences        Chrysalis
3 No. 3,  Article 6  Pg 43.txt
40        nature of their life's work; and their
work         Chrysalis 3 No. 3,  Article 6 
Pg 43.txt
41         nature of female
reality        Chrysalis 3 No. 3,  Article 8 
Pg 65.txt
42        nature of reality       Chrysalis 3 No. 3, 
Article 8  Pg 65.txt
43        nature of surrealism,  which 
was its original and deepest   Chrysalis
3 No. 3,  Article 8  Pg 65.txt
44        nature of this industry        Chrysalis 3 No. 3,  Article 9 
Pg 79.txt
45        nature of hair.          Chrysalis 3 No. 3, 
Article 9  Pg 79.txt
46        nature of pornography        Chrysalis 4 No. 4  Article 1 
Pg 11.txt
47         duplicate
48        “nature of the language”   Chrysalis 4 No. 4  Article 15 
Pg 111.txt
49        the nature of the mind       Chrysalis 4 No. 4  Article 15 
Pg 111.txt
50        nature of passion among women            Chrysalis 4 No. 4  Article 2 
Pg 19.txt
51         nature of relationships Chrysalis 4 No.
4  Article 2  Pg 19.txt
52        nature of women.      Chrysalis 4 No.
4  Article 4  Pg 35.txt
53        nature of causing us to divide our
minds. Chrysalis 4 No. 4  Article 4  Pg 35.txt
54        nature of "reality"   Chrysalis 4 No. 4  Article 9 
Pg 67.txt
55         nature of Irene's privileges.         Chrysalis 4 No. 4  Article 9 
Pg 67.txt
56         
nature of this world          Chrysalis
4 No. 4 (1) Table of Contents.txt
57        nature of any writing by women   Chrysalis 4 No. 4 (1) Table of Contents.txt
58        nature of  these images     Chrysalis
4 No. 4 (1) Table of Contents.txt
59        nature of the institution    Chrysalis 5 No. 5  Article 11 
Pg 93.txt
60        nature of desire. Chrysalis 5 No. 5  Article 4 
Pg 37.txt
61        nature of Elena's  Chrysalis 5 No. 5  Article 4 
Pg 37.txt
62        nature of its impact            Chrysalis 5 No. 5  Article 5 
Pg 43.txt
63         nature of the groups          Chrysalis 5 No. 5  Article 5 
Pg 43.txt
64        nature of the book:  Chrysalis 5 No. 5  Article 8 
Pg 71.txt
65        nature of those actions      Chrysalis 6 No.  6 Table of Contents.txt
66        nature of spirit.        Chrysalis 6 No. 6 
Article 1  Pg 9.txt
67        nature of their skills Chrysalis 6 No.
6  Article 1  Pg 9.txt
68         nature of feminism            Chrysalis 6 No. 6  Article 11 
Pg 77.txt
69        nature of interrelationships among
women.    Chrysalis 6 No. 6  Article 13 
Pg 103.txt
70        nature of dialogue  Chrysalis 6 No. 6  Article 13 
Pg 103.txt
71        nature of poetry  Chrysalis 6 No. 6  Article 13 
Pg 103.txt
72        nature of their garments    Chrysalis 6 No. 6  Article 6 
Pg 39.txt
73         nature of our moral being            Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 1 
Pg 9.txt
74        nature of sexual politics    Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 1 
Pg 9.txt
75        "nature of publishing “      Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 11 
Pg 87.txt
76         DUPLICATE
77        the nature of women Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 12 
Pg 103 (1).txt
78        nature of matter         Chrysalis
7 No. 7  Article 12  Pg 103 (1).txt
79        nature of matter Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 12 
Pg 103 (1).txt
80        the nature of women.            Chrysalis
7 No. 7  Article 12  Pg 103 (1).txt
81        nature of things;         Chrysalis
7 No. 7  Article 12  Pg 103 (1).txt
82        nature of this knowledge  Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 4 
Pg 39.txt
83        nature of consciousness.   Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 4 
Pg 39.txt
84        nature of man          Chrysalis 7 No. 7 
Article 4  Pg 39.txt
85        nature of man Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 4 
Pg 39.txt
86        nature of the relationship Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 4 
Pg 39.txt
87        nature of the journal          Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 4 
Pg 39.txt
88        nature of death        Chrysalis 7 No. 7 
Article 6  Pg 55.txt
89         nature of the artist Chrysalis 7 No. 7  Article 6 
Pg 55.txt
90        nature of this romance.      Chrysalis 8 No. 8  Article 1 
Pg 17.txt
91        nature of my affection        Chrysalis 8 No. 8  Article 1 
Pg 17.txt
92        DUPLICATE
93        nature of the self    Chrysalis 8 No. 8  Article 4 
Pg 43.txt
94         nature of the healing        Chrysalis 8 No. 8  Article 4 
Pg 43.txt
95        nature of the biological damage Chrysalis 9 No. 9  Article 2 
Pg 15.txt
96        nature of that exchange.    Chrysalis 9 No. 9  Article 3  
Pg  29.txt
97        nature of heterosexual      Chrysalis 9 No. 9 Table of Contents.txt
#41 “the
nature of female reality” turns out to be from an art historical article on the
women of surrealism Gloria Feman Orenstein “Leonora Carrington's Visionary Art
for the New Age” in which she argues that is key to redefining women’s place in
western male-dominated art history “The study of the female imagination is
perhaps the most crucial point of focus in contemporary feminist criticism in
the arts, for it is that part of our total investigation into the nature of
female reality that strives to understand and redefine women's potentialities
in the many as-yet-uncharted and multidimensional realms of female experience
that are now unfolding.” While clearly Orenstein believes some “female
experience” exists, she does not reduce it to a singular, instead referring to
the “multidimensional realms” 
No 50 In Susan Griffin’s
article “Woman and Nature,” the full book version of which is often pointed to
as a touchstone of cultural feminism, “nature of” appears three times, two of
which use nature only one of which is “the nature of women” discussed in
regards to her criticism of “patriarchy,
[which] has always regarded  and  treated 
women and nature in the same way as nature.
#52 an
  reference by Jane E. Caputi in The Glamour of Grammar to the “authentic
  nature of women” does seem to fit the cultural feminist paradigm in that it
  seems to imply a “singular” nature of women 
if not
  fully essentialist what about apolitical Orenstein refers to “potentialities”
  while Caputi understands witchcraft as based on “weapon)s” used “by men” to
  oppress women, but whether that is “politically” engaged is open to debate 
The
  most interesting and suggestive in terms of cultural feminism revolve around the
  five references in a collective review of the books of Honor Moore, Mary
  Daly, Susan Griffin and Alix Kates Shulman, in which “Moore is shaped
  by a patriarchal idea of the nature of women, by an idea alien to us.” Griffin 
  on Daly Well, your question really ought to be,"How does  one 
  not  experience  an idea?" Daly  shows 
  us  that  the 
  whole experience of seeing 
  and  being  in this culture is shaped  by a patriarchal idea of the nature of women.”  Review of Grffin by  Daly “As the author explains,  the first book,  "Matter," begins by tracing a
  history of patriarchy's judgments 
  about the nature of matter, or the nature of nature, and places these
  judgments side by side, chronologically, with men's opinions about the nature
  of women” 
 | 
  |
In this review we might get closest to the idea of cultural feminism, unsurprisingly since these are the very authors most frequently "named" as cultural feminists. But the question then becomes when placed in the quantitative context, why is the way nature was used by other authors less important in defining the "kind" of feminism spoken in Chrysalis.* And if Chrysalis speaks nature quantitatively more than OOB, but does it speak it qualitatively differently? Next up close readings of the “nature of” in OOB that will hopefully shed some more light.
postscripts
* Another issue is does Chrysalis as art art/culture periodical speak nature in the same
quantity/quality as other art world periodicals of the same era?  In any case, Chrysalis is largely interpreted as a cultrual feminist periodical following Echols' description (284).  See Bruce Shulman, The Seventies: The Great Shift in American culture, Society, and Politics, 172; Denise Thompson, Reading Between the Lines: A Lesbian Feminist Critique of Feminist Accounts, 103; Kyle Stephan, Stanford Library Guide Feminism and Contemporary Art," http://library.stanford.edu/guides/feminism-and-contemporary-art;
** "the body" provides an even more interesting example. 96 examples appear in the concordance, but 36 derive from a single article with a second article containing 10 instances, which create an over-impression of the usage of "the body" in the entire corpus.
*** "of female" the second cluster (following the female) seemed more likely to yield results that were not "the female" as a subject. More similar to that of "of nature" above, in 45 files, and of relatively even distribution, although spikes in article by Mary Daly Sparking: The Fire of Female Friendship.
Could it be that the association of certain words used by certain authors are being overweighed in the overall discourse of Chrysalis?
** "the body" provides an even more interesting example. 96 examples appear in the concordance, but 36 derive from a single article with a second article containing 10 instances, which create an over-impression of the usage of "the body" in the entire corpus.
*** "of female" the second cluster (following the female) seemed more likely to yield results that were not "the female" as a subject. More similar to that of "of nature" above, in 45 files, and of relatively even distribution, although spikes in article by Mary Daly Sparking: The Fire of Female Friendship.
Could it be that the association of certain words used by certain authors are being overweighed in the overall discourse of Chrysalis?
UPDATE, as nearly always at the suggestion of @heatherfro,
@ProfessMoravec maybe you should blog about all of it a day later!
Its just shy of 6AM and I'm sitting in the dark, writing by the glow of my screen, coffee cup nestled between my body and the couch cushion.  Like a lot of faculty, this is how my DH work, blogging and tweeting often get done.  Sandwiched in between the teaching (4/4 no repeat preps) commute (10+ hours a week) and "life" (offsprings, dogs, spouse, exercise, food, breathing, you know....).  Sometimes I feel ashamed that I've put up a blog post that has misspelt words or less than flowing writing, but then I realize if I didn't, I'd never put up anything.  I'd never have dived in the very deep end of the ocean that is participating in the online community of DH.  
I'm a full two academic generations older than many of the DH tweeps I know online, having been academic a full two decades now, so I suppose its my turn to give back a bit by sharing that hard-won wisdom, waiting for perfection is a luxury very few academics have.  By all means if you've unlimited time and money, wait, polish, then publish.  For everyone else, remember "done is good enough" and "the perfect is the enemy of the good," two mantras that have gotten me few these last two decades.  

heather froehlich 
via twitter
ReplyDeleteCath Andrews @andrews_cath 14m
@ProfessMoravec I commented and then the internet ate it. Basically I wanted to ask if "nature" as a stand-alone word was equally frequent.
M.M. @ProfessMoravec 13m
@andrews_cath darn internet. not sure I understand, are you asking abt raw freq of nature in each periodical?
or nature as a particular part of speech
Cath Andrews @andrews_cath 11m
@ProfessMoravec I am struck by how much the contributors liked the "nature of" turn of phrase. You suggested comparing this periodical's usage with others' to see if it was unusual. I wondered if looking at the use of "nature" on its own (not as a descriptor)
M.M. @ProfessMoravec 11m
@andrews_cath yes, me too, they "spoke" nature, but not how we usually think of them as doing so
Cath Andrews @andrews_cath 10m
@ProfessMoravec usage with others' to see if it was unusual. I wondered if looking at the use of "nature" on its own (not as a descriptor)
Cath Andrews @andrews_cath 10m
@ProfessMoravec would also be illuminating. But am not a linguist or a statistican, so my musings may be totally irrelevant ,-)
I guess I'm not really understanding your method. Which software are you using for your coding? I've just come across this from the person behind NVIVO, the software I used: http://blog.qsrinternational.com/a-quick-chat-with-pat-bazeley/?utm_campaign=Bazeley-130326&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=microblog-link+text&utm_content=130310-blog+interview&utm_term=blog+interview That kind of describes my method. My work is not about counting words, it's about making meaning from what people say in context. Interesting the different ways we go about things.
ReplyDeleteI'm using Antconc which I do like. I do think word frequency can be interesting especially in conjunction with collocates and clusters part 2.5 starts getting at semantic prosody http://historyinthecity.blogspot.com/2013/04/womens-history-with-digital-tools-part.html
ReplyDelete