My Day of Digital Humanities begins with crack of dawn wake up, exercise, then getting
ready for work. By 715 I’m in my office
ordering food for a lunch meeting. I teach three classes today so not much DH is going to happen (update until late it turns out because I can't stand to be left out of the fun of #DayofDH)
So far my sole contact with DH work has been to sign the
time sheet for the graduate assistant I’m lucky to have. She spent the semester digitizing periodicals
for me, creating a spread sheet of citations, and now will start on the laborious
process of cleaning the data. Because
she also works as an intern I spent several hours yesterday experimenting with
methods for cleaning some particularly tedious multi-column pages, and then
emailing her instructions. I'm hoping to write a short part II follow up to my first post on the results of this project.
In a quick 1.5 hour break from teaching, I'm going to work on my google doc journal for a grant funded metacognition pedagogy project. No history but at least digital!
I wrote the above all before lunch,then taught, commuted home, hit emergency dentist repair, had family time and then spent the lasttwo hours four hours doing the digital work to write the following, the second part of doing women's history with digital methods.
In this review we might get closest to the idea of cultural feminism, unsurprisingly since these are the very authors most frequently "named" as cultural feminists. But the question then becomes when placed in the quantitative context, why is the way nature was used by other authors less important in defining the "kind" of feminism spoken in Chrysalis.* And if Chrysalis speaks nature quantitatively more than OOB, but does it speak it qualitatively differently? Next up close readings of the “nature of” in OOB that will hopefully shed some more light.
postscripts
In a quick 1.5 hour break from teaching, I'm going to work on my google doc journal for a grant funded metacognition pedagogy project. No history but at least digital!
I wrote the above all before lunch,then taught, commuted home, hit emergency dentist repair, had family time and then spent the last
Keyness
Keyness measures the
frequency of a word in a corpus relative to is usage in another corpus. This makes it an interesting way to compare
corpora. If we look at Chrysalis and OOB,
the words with the highest keyness (higher value = more exceptional), the words
that "pop" might not suprirse any scholar of women’s liberation or really any
schlar familiar with feminist theory.
Female, nature, body goddess, which initially would appear
to be confirming descriptions and impressions of cultural feminism from the
literature, but using digtal tools reveals a deeper story. While nature is more
frequent in Chrysalis, Frequency 348, with kyness of 247, oob 215, both
periodicals have the same collocate & cluster for nature “nature of.” Given
the other keyness words we might expect to see “the nature of the female body”
or the nature of women” or the nature of the goddess. Using the concordance view reveals that
“nature of” does not end with any of those ways.
Instead we see nature of over
94 times in forty-five items, almost a third of those that comprise that Chrysalis
concordance. Clearly the writers in this
periodical liked the turn of phrase, but how are they using it? The Concordance
view allows for close reading which reveals exactly how “nature of” used and very few include
references to women or female or body
I spent the past almost two
hours hand cleaning and culling the following data:
1 nature of painting Chrysalis 1 No. 1 Article 10
Pg 101.txt
2 nature of the ailment Chrysalis 1 No. 1 Article 7
Pg 67.txt
3 nature of her is culpable {reference to
Eve, critical] Chrysalis 1 No. 1, Article Pg 31-1.txt
4 DUPLICATE
4 DUPLICATE
5 nature of woman [critical of male
usage] Chrysalis 1 No. 1, Article 6 Pg 55.txt
6 nature of our work Chrysalis 1 No. 1, Article 6
Pg 55.txt
7 nature of the animal Chrysalis 1 No. 1, Article 6
Pg 55.txt
8 nature of sexual identity Chrysalis 10
No. 10 Table of Contents.txt letter from
Eleanor Antin
9 nature of their activities.
9 nature of their activities.
Chrysalis
10 No. 10 Table of Contents.txt letter
from Eleanor Antin
10 nature of the virtues Chrysalis 10
No. 10 Table of Contents.txt letter from
Eleanor Antin
11 nature of reality. Chrysalis 10 No. 10 Table of Contents.txt letter from Eleanor
Antin
13 nature of the self and "the other" Chrysalis 10 No. 10 Table of Contents.txt letter from Eleanor
Antin
14 nature
of the child. Chrysalis 10 No. 10 Article 1
Pg 13.txt
15 nature of my children, cause th'ey're
all grown now and got Chrysalis 10 No.
10 Article 1 Pg 13.txt
16 nature of the genre Chrysalis 10 No. 10 Article 7
Pg 51 (1).txt
17 "the nature of rape has changed” Chrysalis 10 No. 10 Article 7
Pg 51 (1).txt
18 nature of women's everyday dress Chrysalis 2 No. 2 Article 12
Pg 91.txt
19 nature of human Chrysalis 2 No. 2
Article 16 Pg 115.txt
20 the nature of their relationship Chrysalis 2 No. 2 Article 16
Pg 115.txt
21 nature of his existence Chrysalis 2 No. 2 Article 16
Pg 115.txt
22 nature of the process of growth. Chrysalis 2 No. 2 Article 18
Pg 131.txt
23 nature of the creation process Chrysalis 2 No. 2 Article 2
Pg 11 (1).txt
24 nature of man himself, Chrysalis 2 No.
2 Article 2 Pg 11 (1).txt
25 nature of a culture Chrysalis 2 No. 2 Article 3
Pg 19 (1).txt
26 nature of the participation Chrysalis 2 No. 2 Article 3
Pg 19 (1).txt
27 nature of the thicket, Chrysalis 2 No. 2 Article 6
Pg 49.txt
28 nature of oppressive female role
conditioning Chrysalis 2 No.
2 Article 7 Pg 53.txt
29 " nature of the foundation beast” Chrysalis 3 No. 3, Article 13
Pg 103.txt
30 nature of political force Chrysalis 3 No. 3, Article 15
Pg 119.txt
31 nature of phenomenon Chrysalis 3 No. 3, Article 2
Pg 11.txt
32 male-centered nature Chrysalis 3 No. 3, Article 2
Pg 11.txt
33 nature of women and men Chrysalis 3 No. 3, Article 2
Pg 11.txt
34 “nature of gender dissatisfaction” Chrysalis
3 No. 3, Article 2 Pg 11.txt
35 nature of the women's movement during
the rapidly changing Chrysalis 3
No. 3, Article 6 Pg 43.txt
36 nature of our human Chrysalis 3 No. 3, Article 6
Pg 43.txt
37 nature of class Chrysalis 3 No. 3,
Article 6 Pg 43.txt
38 nature of their private lives Chrysalis 3 No. 3, Article 6
Pg 43.txt
39 nature of women's differing sexual preferences Chrysalis
3 No. 3, Article 6 Pg 43.txt
40 nature of their life's work; and their
work Chrysalis 3 No. 3, Article 6
Pg 43.txt
41 nature of female
reality Chrysalis 3 No. 3, Article 8
Pg 65.txt
42 nature of reality Chrysalis 3 No. 3,
Article 8 Pg 65.txt
43 nature of surrealism, which
was its original and deepest Chrysalis
3 No. 3, Article 8 Pg 65.txt
44 nature of this industry Chrysalis 3 No. 3, Article 9
Pg 79.txt
45 nature of hair. Chrysalis 3 No. 3,
Article 9 Pg 79.txt
46 nature of pornography Chrysalis 4 No. 4 Article 1
Pg 11.txt
47 duplicate
48 “nature of the language” Chrysalis 4 No. 4 Article 15
Pg 111.txt
49 the nature of the mind Chrysalis 4 No. 4 Article 15
Pg 111.txt
50 nature of passion among women Chrysalis 4 No. 4 Article 2
Pg 19.txt
51 nature of relationships Chrysalis 4 No.
4 Article 2 Pg 19.txt
52 nature of women. Chrysalis 4 No.
4 Article 4 Pg 35.txt
53 nature of causing us to divide our
minds. Chrysalis 4 No. 4 Article 4 Pg 35.txt
54 nature of "reality" Chrysalis 4 No. 4 Article 9
Pg 67.txt
55 nature of Irene's privileges. Chrysalis 4 No. 4 Article 9
Pg 67.txt
56
nature of this world Chrysalis
4 No. 4 (1) Table of Contents.txt
57 nature of any writing by women Chrysalis 4 No. 4 (1) Table of Contents.txt
58 nature of these images Chrysalis
4 No. 4 (1) Table of Contents.txt
59 nature of the institution Chrysalis 5 No. 5 Article 11
Pg 93.txt
60 nature of desire. Chrysalis 5 No. 5 Article 4
Pg 37.txt
61 nature of Elena's Chrysalis 5 No. 5 Article 4
Pg 37.txt
62 nature of its impact Chrysalis 5 No. 5 Article 5
Pg 43.txt
63 nature of the groups Chrysalis 5 No. 5 Article 5
Pg 43.txt
64 nature of the book: Chrysalis 5 No. 5 Article 8
Pg 71.txt
65 nature of those actions Chrysalis 6 No. 6 Table of Contents.txt
66 nature of spirit. Chrysalis 6 No. 6
Article 1 Pg 9.txt
67 nature of their skills Chrysalis 6 No.
6 Article 1 Pg 9.txt
68 nature of feminism Chrysalis 6 No. 6 Article 11
Pg 77.txt
69 nature of interrelationships among
women. Chrysalis 6 No. 6 Article 13
Pg 103.txt
70 nature of dialogue Chrysalis 6 No. 6 Article 13
Pg 103.txt
71 nature of poetry Chrysalis 6 No. 6 Article 13
Pg 103.txt
72 nature of their garments Chrysalis 6 No. 6 Article 6
Pg 39.txt
73 nature of our moral being Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 1
Pg 9.txt
74 nature of sexual politics Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 1
Pg 9.txt
75 "nature of publishing “ Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 11
Pg 87.txt
76 DUPLICATE
77 the nature of women Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 12
Pg 103 (1).txt
78 nature of matter Chrysalis
7 No. 7 Article 12 Pg 103 (1).txt
79 nature of matter Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 12
Pg 103 (1).txt
80 the nature of women. Chrysalis
7 No. 7 Article 12 Pg 103 (1).txt
81 nature of things; Chrysalis
7 No. 7 Article 12 Pg 103 (1).txt
82 nature of this knowledge Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 4
Pg 39.txt
83 nature of consciousness. Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 4
Pg 39.txt
84 nature of man Chrysalis 7 No. 7
Article 4 Pg 39.txt
85 nature of man Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 4
Pg 39.txt
86 nature of the relationship Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 4
Pg 39.txt
87 nature of the journal Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 4
Pg 39.txt
88 nature of death Chrysalis 7 No. 7
Article 6 Pg 55.txt
89 nature of the artist Chrysalis 7 No. 7 Article 6
Pg 55.txt
90 nature of this romance. Chrysalis 8 No. 8 Article 1
Pg 17.txt
91 nature of my affection Chrysalis 8 No. 8 Article 1
Pg 17.txt
92 DUPLICATE
93 nature of the self Chrysalis 8 No. 8 Article 4
Pg 43.txt
94 nature of the healing Chrysalis 8 No. 8 Article 4
Pg 43.txt
95 nature of the biological damage Chrysalis 9 No. 9 Article 2
Pg 15.txt
96 nature of that exchange. Chrysalis 9 No. 9 Article 3
Pg 29.txt
97 nature of heterosexual Chrysalis 9 No. 9 Table of Contents.txt
#41 “the
nature of female reality” turns out to be from an art historical article on the
women of surrealism Gloria Feman Orenstein “Leonora Carrington's Visionary Art
for the New Age” in which she argues that is key to redefining women’s place in
western male-dominated art history “The study of the female imagination is
perhaps the most crucial point of focus in contemporary feminist criticism in
the arts, for it is that part of our total investigation into the nature of
female reality that strives to understand and redefine women's potentialities
in the many as-yet-uncharted and multidimensional realms of female experience
that are now unfolding.” While clearly Orenstein believes some “female
experience” exists, she does not reduce it to a singular, instead referring to
the “multidimensional realms”
No 50 In Susan Griffin’s
article “Woman and Nature,” the full book version of which is often pointed to
as a touchstone of cultural feminism, “nature of” appears three times, two of
which use nature only one of which is “the nature of women” discussed in
regards to her criticism of “patriarchy,
[which] has always regarded and treated
women and nature in the same way as nature.
#52 an
reference by Jane E. Caputi in The Glamour of Grammar to the “authentic
nature of women” does seem to fit the cultural feminist paradigm in that it
seems to imply a “singular” nature of women
if not
fully essentialist what about apolitical Orenstein refers to “potentialities”
while Caputi understands witchcraft as based on “weapon)s” used “by men” to
oppress women, but whether that is “politically” engaged is open to debate
The
most interesting and suggestive in terms of cultural feminism revolve around the
five references in a collective review of the books of Honor Moore, Mary
Daly, Susan Griffin and Alix Kates Shulman, in which “Moore is shaped
by a patriarchal idea of the nature of women, by an idea alien to us.” Griffin
on Daly Well, your question really ought to be,"How does one
not experience an idea?" Daly shows
us that the
whole experience of seeing
and being in this culture is shaped by a patriarchal idea of the nature of women.” Review of Grffin by Daly “As the author explains, the first book, "Matter," begins by tracing a
history of patriarchy's judgments
about the nature of matter, or the nature of nature, and places these
judgments side by side, chronologically, with men's opinions about the nature
of women”
|
In this review we might get closest to the idea of cultural feminism, unsurprisingly since these are the very authors most frequently "named" as cultural feminists. But the question then becomes when placed in the quantitative context, why is the way nature was used by other authors less important in defining the "kind" of feminism spoken in Chrysalis.* And if Chrysalis speaks nature quantitatively more than OOB, but does it speak it qualitatively differently? Next up close readings of the “nature of” in OOB that will hopefully shed some more light.
postscripts
* Another issue is does Chrysalis as art art/culture periodical speak nature in the same
quantity/quality as other art world periodicals of the same era? In any case, Chrysalis is largely interpreted as a cultrual feminist periodical following Echols' description (284). See Bruce Shulman, The Seventies: The Great Shift in American culture, Society, and Politics, 172; Denise Thompson, Reading Between the Lines: A Lesbian Feminist Critique of Feminist Accounts, 103; Kyle Stephan, Stanford Library Guide Feminism and Contemporary Art," http://library.stanford.edu/guides/feminism-and-contemporary-art;
** "the body" provides an even more interesting example. 96 examples appear in the concordance, but 36 derive from a single article with a second article containing 10 instances, which create an over-impression of the usage of "the body" in the entire corpus.
*** "of female" the second cluster (following the female) seemed more likely to yield results that were not "the female" as a subject. More similar to that of "of nature" above, in 45 files, and of relatively even distribution, although spikes in article by Mary Daly Sparking: The Fire of Female Friendship.
Could it be that the association of certain words used by certain authors are being overweighed in the overall discourse of Chrysalis?
** "the body" provides an even more interesting example. 96 examples appear in the concordance, but 36 derive from a single article with a second article containing 10 instances, which create an over-impression of the usage of "the body" in the entire corpus.
*** "of female" the second cluster (following the female) seemed more likely to yield results that were not "the female" as a subject. More similar to that of "of nature" above, in 45 files, and of relatively even distribution, although spikes in article by Mary Daly Sparking: The Fire of Female Friendship.
Could it be that the association of certain words used by certain authors are being overweighed in the overall discourse of Chrysalis?
UPDATE, as nearly always at the suggestion of @heatherfro,
@ProfessMoravec maybe you should blog about all of it a day later!
Its just shy of 6AM and I'm sitting in the dark, writing by the glow of my screen, coffee cup nestled between my body and the couch cushion. Like a lot of faculty, this is how my DH work, blogging and tweeting often get done. Sandwiched in between the teaching (4/4 no repeat preps) commute (10+ hours a week) and "life" (offsprings, dogs, spouse, exercise, food, breathing, you know....). Sometimes I feel ashamed that I've put up a blog post that has misspelt words or less than flowing writing, but then I realize if I didn't, I'd never put up anything. I'd never have dived in the very deep end of the ocean that is participating in the online community of DH.
I'm a full two academic generations older than many of the DH tweeps I know online, having been academic a full two decades now, so I suppose its my turn to give back a bit by sharing that hard-won wisdom, waiting for perfection is a luxury very few academics have. By all means if you've unlimited time and money, wait, polish, then publish. For everyone else, remember "done is good enough" and "the perfect is the enemy of the good," two mantras that have gotten me few these last two decades.
via twitter
ReplyDeleteCath Andrews @andrews_cath 14m
@ProfessMoravec I commented and then the internet ate it. Basically I wanted to ask if "nature" as a stand-alone word was equally frequent.
M.M. @ProfessMoravec 13m
@andrews_cath darn internet. not sure I understand, are you asking abt raw freq of nature in each periodical?
or nature as a particular part of speech
Cath Andrews @andrews_cath 11m
@ProfessMoravec I am struck by how much the contributors liked the "nature of" turn of phrase. You suggested comparing this periodical's usage with others' to see if it was unusual. I wondered if looking at the use of "nature" on its own (not as a descriptor)
M.M. @ProfessMoravec 11m
@andrews_cath yes, me too, they "spoke" nature, but not how we usually think of them as doing so
Cath Andrews @andrews_cath 10m
@ProfessMoravec usage with others' to see if it was unusual. I wondered if looking at the use of "nature" on its own (not as a descriptor)
Cath Andrews @andrews_cath 10m
@ProfessMoravec would also be illuminating. But am not a linguist or a statistican, so my musings may be totally irrelevant ,-)
I guess I'm not really understanding your method. Which software are you using for your coding? I've just come across this from the person behind NVIVO, the software I used: http://blog.qsrinternational.com/a-quick-chat-with-pat-bazeley/?utm_campaign=Bazeley-130326&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=microblog-link+text&utm_content=130310-blog+interview&utm_term=blog+interview That kind of describes my method. My work is not about counting words, it's about making meaning from what people say in context. Interesting the different ways we go about things.
ReplyDeleteI'm using Antconc which I do like. I do think word frequency can be interesting especially in conjunction with collocates and clusters part 2.5 starts getting at semantic prosody http://historyinthecity.blogspot.com/2013/04/womens-history-with-digital-tools-part.html
ReplyDelete